At Gucci, Michele Alessandro’s tawny, fur covered loafers gave the
impression of elaborate slippers or house shoes, with fur so impractically long,
thick, and lustrous that models had to schlep down the catwalk in them. As the slightly
madcap cherry on top of Michele’s debut collection, they provided an element of
thought provoking surrealism within a show that took Gucci in a new direction
overall.
Over at
Antonio Marras, models’ toes showed through a
miniscule gap in cheekily open-toed fur sandals, whilst at Fendi, chic, fur covered boots featured in a variety of colours, also appearing in a modified design where the fur, legwarmer style, started just above the ankle. Voluminous fur collars, trousers and coats meant that the look wasn’t just confined to footwear.
miniscule gap in cheekily open-toed fur sandals, whilst at Fendi, chic, fur covered boots featured in a variety of colours, also appearing in a modified design where the fur, legwarmer style, started just above the ankle. Voluminous fur collars, trousers and coats meant that the look wasn’t just confined to footwear.
Because, bizarre as it was, there was something attractive about the fur
that appeared on Milan’s runways: something tactile, and inviting. This was
fashion that was crying out to be touched, stroked, petted and loved. But there
was also something unruly and dangerous about it. Where it appeared, fur indicated
a wilder side to designer’s imaginations, an outlandish and unruly streak that
looked to upset conventions and challenge the norm.
Whether or not fur covered slippers will replace the little black dress
as a woman’s go to killer seduction item remains to be seen. But in Milan, Michele,
Lagerfeld and the rest of them have taken the all important first step,
challenging our perceptions of sexuality, and showing that beauty, too, can
take on many, sometimes unexpected, forms.
images via http://www.vogue.co.uk/
No comments:
Post a Comment